{"status":"ok","elements":"
\n
\n
\n \"AI<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 1 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n The World\u2019s First-Ever AI Regulation<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

The European Union\u2019s most successful digital export may be regulation. After GDPR and DSM and other famous abbreviations, now is time for the AI Act. We\u2019re told it is the world\u2019s first-ever AI-regulation. (In fact, we\u2019re told over and over.) AI Act – World’s First AI Regulation, read more from Netopia on Artificial Intelligence here\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"AI<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n AI Existential Threat to Humanity<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

In time honoured tradition, we turned to OpenAI Chat GPT to write the text below. Probing the hive-mind of the scraped data of millions of webpages, and datasets to find out what threats exist. Below is the response. Should we really be concered for the future of humanity? What threats from AI can you invisage? We asked: What are the threats that AI poses to humanity? While AI has the potential to bring about numerous benefits, it is essential to consider potential threats and risks associated with its development and deployment. Here are some concerns that have been raised regarding […]<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n If Putin Pulls The Plug<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

The Kremlin has directed Russian businesses use the .ru-domain rather than .com – symbolic? Some experts say the Russian regime performed a \u201cdress rehearsal\u201d of disconnecting from the global internet in 2019. Will Putin\u2019s War Split the Internet?\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"\"<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Know Your Arms Dealer Customer<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

That murky situation where the online middle man takes no responsibility for who they trade with. Can it be fixed with the\u00a0Digital Services Act andthe “Know Your Business Customer” principle? If not that, then what?      <\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"Getting<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Getting Rid of Outdated Regulation<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

Some call the E-Commerce Directive from 2001 outdated. Many of them want to replace it with something like the US Communications Decency Act Section 230. Which dates back to 1996.   As Editor Per Str\u00f6mb\u00e4ck writes: “The mythology is strong, though. Tech gurus are fond of saying that immunity from responsibility is the heart of how the internet works. Without it, no Wikipedia.\u00a0No freedom of speech. No innovation.” To read the full post, go here<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"Who<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Who Ate the Copyright Reform?<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>
\n
\n
\n \"Wikimedia<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Wikipedia Black-Out<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

Rather ironically, during the EU Copyright Directive vote stages Google funded Wikipedia blacked out in various countries and encouraged users to remonstrate with MEPs citing #saveyourinternet as a hashtag, claiming not doing so would lead to #uploadfilters, and restricting content.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"(C)<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Big Tech Pulling The Strings.<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n

Big Tech is pulling the strings of a small choir.\u00a0 When not spamming MEPs, there are voices who incorrectly claim their right to free content is greater than the right to a fair wage and respect for workers’ rights. So long as big tech is funding “dark pattern” astroturfing, the consumer, activists (and clicktivists!) are all equally hoodwinked.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>

\n
\n
\n \"Avalanche<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n 0 Response<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n Campaigning Under an Avalanche of Spam<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>","max_pages":2}